We have identified a County Court Judgment (CCJ) that is recorded as being against a person named “Ceri-Ann Ridsdale” and explicitly noted as trading as “Jayne’s Baby Bank”. The record indicates the judgment is unsatisfied (unpaid) as at the date of the record.
What the court record indicates
The court-registered entry we have reviewed indicates:
- Name shown on the record: Ceri-Ann Ridsdale
- Trading style shown on the record: Jayne’s Baby Bank
- Court shown on the record: County Court Online
- Case reference shown on the record: 521MC287
- Date shown on the record: 23 May 2024
- Amount shown on the record: £7,141
- Status shown on the record: Unsatisfied
In plain terms: this is a court-registered civil judgment linked to the Jayne’s Baby Bank trading identity, and it is shown as unpaid on the record reviewed.
Name variation and why it matters
The judgment is not recorded under the name most commonly used in public-facing fundraising and promotion. Instead, it is registered under the name “Ceri-Ann Ridsdale”, while the same individual publicly trades and presents herself primarily as “Jayne Price”.
At the same time, Electoral Roll records show the name Carrie Anne Ridsdale registered at her residential address. In addition, a driving licence image that has been publicly posted shows the name Jayne-Anne Price.
This creates a multi-name pattern connected to the same operation and/or public persona:
- Jayne Price – used publicly as a trading and promotional identity
- Jayne-Anne Price – shown on the publicly posted driving licence
- Carrie Anne Ridsdale – shown on Electoral Roll records at the residential address
- Ceri-Ann Ridsdale – shown on the County Court Judgment trading as Jayne’s Baby Bank
- Ceri-Anne Ridsdale – shown on the Aberbargoed enforcement / eviction notice
People can lawfully change names, use preferred names, or adopt different spellings. However, where a person is soliciting donations, applying for registrations, and trading under a public-benefit identity, consistent identity presentation is a governance expectation.
Multiple similar-but-different names across civil liability records, tenancy enforcement, electoral registration, and public trading materially affect:
- Public due diligence
- Donor background checks
- Searchability of judgments and liabilities
- Accountability and transparency expectations
Where name variations exist, the straightforward safeguard is simple: publish clear confirmation of the legal name used for liabilities and registrations, and the relationship (if any) to any trading names used to solicit public donations.
Commercial lease: composite legal identity
A commercial lease for retail premises signed in January 2023 further reinforces the identity-variation pattern.
The lease document lists the tenant as:
- Tenant name: Miss Jayne-Anne Carrie-Anne Ridsdale
- Tenant address: 7 Meadow Road, Springfield, Blackwood, NP12 2AG
- Property: 5 Crane Street, Pontypool, NP4 6LY
- Lease start date: 17 January 2023
This is relevant because it combines the Price-style forename identity (“Jayne-Anne”) with the Ridsdale surname and the Carrie-Anne variant used in Electoral Roll records into a single composite legal name.
In other words, the lease directly links:
- The Price-style public identity (Jayne / Jayne-Anne)
- The Ridsdale legal surname
- The Carrie-Anne name used on residential records
into one formal commercial tenancy instrument.
This document materially undermines any suggestion that the Price and Ridsdale identities relate to different people. It shows they are being used interchangeably by the same individual in formal legal contexts.
This strengthens the due-diligence relevance of the CCJ and eviction records being registered under Ridsdale variants while public fundraising and trading are conducted under the “Jayne Price” identity.
Historical regulatory filing under the “Jayne Price” identity
A historical regulatory filing further illustrates the identity inconsistency pattern.
A food business registration submitted to Caerphilly County Borough Council in early 2024 lists:
- Contact representative name: Jayne Price
- Contact representative role: CEO / trustee
- Operator charity name: Jayne’s Mother and Baby Bank and Foodbank Fundraising Shop
- Operator type: A charity (registered by a representative)
- Charity number: Awaiting
- Establishment trading name: Jayne’s Mother and Baby Bank and Foodbank Fundraising Shop
- Establishment address: 68 Tredegar Street, Risca, NP11
- Establishment opening date: 01 January 2024
This filing is relevant because it shows the same operation being presented to a local authority regulator under the name Jayne Price, while:
- Electoral Roll records show Carrie Anne Ridsdale at the residential address
- A County Court Judgment is recorded under Ceri-Ann Ridsdale trading as Jayne’s Baby Bank
- An Aberbargoed enforcement / eviction notice is addressed to Ceri-Anne Ridsdale
- A publicly posted driving licence image shows the name Jayne-Anne Price
For donors, regulators, platforms, and partner bodies, the ability to trace liabilities, enforcement actions, and regulatory filings to a single, consistent legal identity is a basic due-diligence requirement.
This filing therefore forms part of a wider pattern of identity variation across:
- Regulatory registrations
- Public trading activity
- Residential records
- Court-registered civil liabilities
- Commercial tenancy enforcement
- Government-issued identification
PayPal donation page: hybrid identity used for fundraising
A live PayPal donation page used to solicit money for Jayne’s Baby Bank introduces a further identity variant.
The PayPal.me listing at:
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/jaynesbabybank
is titled:
- Account name shown: Jayne R-Price
- Handle: @jaynesbabybank
- Description: “Jayne’s Mother and Baby, Food Bank and Charity shop. 100% of profit goes towards the charity”
The surname format “R-Price” does not appear on any formal record. It is a hybrid construction combining the Ridsdale surname used on court, tenancy, and Electoral Roll records with the Price surname used in public trading and branding.
This means donations are being solicited under yet another personal identity variant that does not match:
- The CCJ debtor name (Ceri-Ann Ridsdale)
- The Electoral Roll name (Carrie Anne Ridsdale)
- The driving licence name (Jayne-Anne Price)
- The commercial lease name (Jayne-Anne Carrie-Anne Ridsdale)
- The regulatory filing name (Jayne Price)
This further compounds the identity inconsistency already documented and extends it into a live fundraising instrument used to collect money from the public.
Prior disclosure: “Carrie Anne” revealed on livestream
This identity pattern is not newly discovered.
In August 2025, during a livestream, the operator inadvertently revealed documentation showing the legal name Carrie Anne Ridsdale in connection with council fines and enforcement correspondence.
That incident was documented in detail in:
Carrie Anne Slips Up Live: Real Name, Real Fines, and a Baby Bank in Trouble
That episode independently corroborates:
- The Electoral Roll name (Carrie Anne Ridsdale)
- The lease composite identity (Jayne-Anne Carrie-Anne Ridsdale)
- The CCJ debtor name (Ceri-Ann Ridsdale)
It shows the same identity variation appearing repeatedly across enforcement, tenancy, regulatory, and financial liability contexts.
Eviction notice: identity continuity across properties
An enforcement / eviction notice was previously served at the former Aberbargoed premises. That notice is addressed to “Ms Ceri-Anne Ridsdale”.
This shows that the Ridsdale surname is not incidental or historical. It remains tied to:
- Her residential records
- Her former commercial premises
- Her court-registered financial liabilities
Driving licence name posted publicly
The individual has publicly posted an image of a driving licence. The visible name shown on that licence is Jayne-Anne Price.
In combination with:
- Electoral Roll records showing Carrie Anne Ridsdale at the residence,
- the CCJ recorded under Ceri-Ann Ridsdale trading as Jayne’s Baby Bank, and
- the Aberbargoed enforcement notice addressed to Ceri-Anne Ridsdale,
the overall picture is not “one spelling difference”, but a repeated pattern of identity variation across contexts where the public would reasonably expect clarity and consistency.
Why this pattern is a public-interest concern
One name variation might be dismissed as clerical or cosmetic. Multiple different names used across:
- Public trading activity
- Residential records
- Court proceedings
- Commercial tenancy enforcement
- Government-issued identification
creates a materially higher risk profile.
Where donations are being solicited and public trust is being invoked, the use of multiple personal identities and trading names associated with the same individual:
- Undermines informed consent by donors
- Complicates due diligence
- Obscures accountability
- Creates avoidable regulatory and safeguarding risk
Fairness, accuracy, and scope
- This post is limited to what is shown on formal records and publicly available materials.
- We make no allegation of criminal conduct.
- We do not assert intent or motive.
- We describe what the records and materials show and why the pattern matters for public due diligence.
Sherlock