HISTORICAL ACCOUNT OF CLAIMS MADE BY CARRIE-ANNE REGARDING BLOOD DISORDERS, TUMOURS, NURSING, DIAGNOSES, TRAINING AND MEDICAL HISTORY (Compiled from public statements and self-described timelines) =========================================================== 1. OVERVIEW OF KEY BIO CLAIMS =========================================================== Her current Facebook bio states: “I worked with Haematology and that is how I discovered I had various blood disorders.” Historically across posts and videos, she also claims: • To have been studying adult nursing, with midwifery and health visiting experience. • To have spent “a week in the bird cadge, at Cardiff Prison, nursing inmates.” • To have discovered serious blood disorders during nursing training. • To have been offered unconditional university places, disability support, and a learning-disability nurse position during interview. • To have been diagnosed with multiple medical and neurodevelopmental conditions: tumour, aplastic anaemia, diabetes, dyslexia, autism, dyscalculia, dyspraxia. The timeline below shows that these claims shift depending on narrative context, often contradicting earlier or later versions. =========================================================== 2. CLAIMS ABOUT DISCOVERING BLOOD DISORDERS =========================================================== Current bio: • “I worked with Haematology and that is how I discovered I had various blood disorders.” But across videos and posts, other conflicting discovery narratives appear: A) CLAIM: BLOOD DISORDERS FOUND DURING NURSING PLACEMENT She repeatedly states she was on a haematology ward placement when a mentor looked at her blood results and allegedly said her haemoglobin was lower than a chemotherapy patient. Examples: • “I had my blood results off my doctor and my mentor said your blood results are worse than this chemo patient.” • “They told me I shouldn’t have been on the ward, I should have been in a bed.” This version claims *nursing training revealed the disorder* and triggered emergency transfusions. B) CLAIM: BLOOD DISORDERS DEVELOPED SECONDARY TO A TUMOUR Elsewhere she states: • “I became very ill and developed aplastic anemia BECAUSE the tumour grew.” • “They left the tumour so long it created this other problem I now have.” This version contradicts the “discovered during haematology placement” version by placing origin years earlier. C) CLAIM: BLOOD DISORDERS PREDATED 2015 She also writes: • “If you know me you will know I have been seriously unwell with a tumour and aplastic anemia since well before 2015.” This contradicts the claim that the disorder was discovered during nursing training in 2016+. D) CLAIM: BLOOD DISORDERS ONLY IDENTIFIED AFTER RECORDS WERE “MISSING” In some posts she asserts that an MRI was missing from her medical records, which delayed diagnosis until she found it herself in 2019. This contradicts the earlier “diagnosed on placement” narrative. E) CLAIM: BLOOD DISORDER TRIGGERED BY SEPSIS / NEUTROPENIA In later statements she says she collapsed in 2020, developed neutropenia and sepsis, and her HB fell to 63—causing the triple transfusion and “developing aplastic anaemia.” This contradicts all earlier timelines. SUMMARY OF CONTRADICTION She has given at least five incompatible discovery mechanisms: 1. Found during haematology nursing placement. 2. Caused by tumour progression. 3. Present since before 2015. 4. Discovered only after retrieving missing MRI records in 2019. 5. Developed after sepsis/neutropenia episode in 2020. These statements cannot all be true simultaneously. =========================================================== 3. CLAIMS REGARDING HAEMOGLOBIN LEVELS AND TRANSFUSIONS =========================================================== Across posts she repeatedly references HB readings and dramatic transfusion thresholds: • HB 60–63 allegedly prompting a “triple emergency transfusion.” • Mentions of haemoglobin thresholds “82 for transfusion,” which is medically inaccurate for UK practice (transfusion guidelines usually consider below ~70 g/L depending on clinical context). Repeated inconsistencies: • She alternates between claiming one triple transfusion and suggesting multiple transfusions. • Her haemoglobin readings are presented inconsistently across narratives depending on emotional framing. • She claims uncontrolled bleeding from cannula removal (“didn’t clot quickly”), inconsistent with severe anaemia but consistent with dramatic self-presentation. =========================================================== 4. CLAIMS ABOUT APLASTIC ANAEMIA =========================================================== Her statements about aplastic anaemia shift significantly: A) CAUSE • Caused by tumour. • Caused by missed MRI. • Caused by delayed treatment. • Caused by neutropenic sepsis. • Present since before 2015. • Diagnosed during nursing placement. B) NATURE OF CONDITION She repeatedly calls it: • “cancer” • “a rare blood and bone marrow cancer” • “palliative” But elsewhere: • Aplastic anaemia is explicitly stated (correctly) as NOT cancer. C) COURSE She claims: • It is incurable and lifelong. • It is being “controlled.” • It has “shrunk” (aplastic anaemia cannot shrink; this refers to a tumour but is conflated with ANA). • It fluctuates with stress and workload. • It requires ongoing transfusions. • It is stable and “clawed back over years.” D) AGE OF ONSET • “Commonly diagnosed in people under 30.” This fact is used to legitimise her own diagnosis without aligning with any age timeline. E) SYMPTOMS AND CONSEQUENCES She attributes numerous unrelated symptoms to aplastic anaemia, including: • iron deficiency • picker disorder • blood sugar issues • bowel symptoms • dizziness • forgetting words • needing volunteers to keep shops open if she is admitted for treatment. SUMMARY Her aplastic anaemia narrative changes depending on: • Self-presentation as a palliative patient. • Attempts to justify inconsistent activity levels. • Efforts to leverage medical authority. =========================================================== 5. CLAIMS ABOUT TUMOUR HISTORY =========================================================== She provides multiple incompatible accounts regarding: • when the tumour was found • who found it • whether it was shelved or missing • whether it caused the blood disorders • whether it shrank spontaneously • whether it required embolisation • whether it caused anaemia, bowel obstruction, or back pain • whether it placed her in palliative care. Contradictions include: A) DISCOVERY • “MRI in 2015 found tumour.” • “MRI was missing from my medical records.” • “I found the tumour myself on a missing MRI.” • “I wasn’t diagnosed until years later.” • “I knew nothing until 2019.” B) TREATMENT • Claims tumour suppressors from 2019–2020. • Claims no treatment until 2021. • Claims embolisation (“operation to stop blood supply”). • Claims tumour shrank massively. • Claims tumour grew rapidly. • Claims tumour size updates vary from 6.8 cm to 7.8 cm with no documentation. C) EFFECTS • Says tumour directly caused aplastic anaemia. • Says tumour caused iron deficiency. • Says tumour caused blood sugar problems. • Says tumour caused mobility limitations. • Says tumour pushed on bowel/spine. • Says tumour triggered palliative status. =========================================================== 6. CLAIMS ABOUT SEPSIS AND NEUTROPENIA =========================================================== Single origin story repeatedly used: • In 2020 she claims she collapsed, was neutropenic, developed sepsis, HB dropped to 63, and required triple transfusion. But: • Elsewhere she claims collapses in 2015 during nursing. • Or collapses in 2016 on ward placement. • Or collapses due to untreated tumour. • Or collapses due to stress or blood sugar. Her sepsis narrative appears to be reverse-engineered to explain the origin of aplastic anaemia, contradicting earlier causes. =========================================================== 7. CLAIMS ABOUT NEURODIVERGENT DIAGNOSES =========================================================== She narrates: • Dyslexia diagnosed via a “five-second phone course.” • Dyspraxia, dyscalculia, autism diagnosed simultaneously by educational psychologist. • NHS confirmed diagnosis afterwards. • Claims these diagnoses were tied to mobility issues linked to knee problems. • Claims university conducted full assessments before placements. Contradictions: • At times she claims no diagnosis until late 2016. • Elsewhere she references learning difficulties going back years. • Uses diagnoses situationally to justify inconsistencies or protect against criticism. =========================================================== 8. CLAIMS ABOUT DIABETES =========================================================== She claims: • Newly diagnosed diabetes. • Hypos in shops. • Poor blood sugars linked to aplastic anaemia. • Being “messed up” by blood sugar without glucometer checks. Diabetes is woven in and out of the illness narrative depending on rhetorical need. =========================================================== 9. CLAIMS ABOUT NURSING EDUCATION AND QUALIFICATIONS =========================================================== There are numerous mutually exclusive storylines: A) UNIVERSITY OFFERS • Guaranteed unconditional offers to *every university*. • Paid to study nursing via NHS bursary. • Offered a learning difficulties nurse position at interview. • Started nursing at Cardiff University. • Also accepted at University of South Wales. • Claims to have a biochemistry diploma used to gain entry. No verifiable timeline aligns with statutory university processes. B) TRAINING CONTENT She asserts she studied: • adult nursing • midwifery • children’s nursing • health visiting • elements of oncology and haematology • oncology ward placement • haematology ward placement • health visitor mandatory placement • maternity mandatory hours • orthopaedics • emergency nursing • DNs (district nurses) • social care • learning disability nursing offer This exceeds what is possible within any standard pre-registration programme and contradicts the NMC curriculum structure. C) NURSING ROLES CLAIMED At various times she claims to be: • a qualified health practitioner • able to authorise baby bank referrals as a healthcare practitioner • trained to work in maternity and theatre • experienced enough to advise mothers clinically • a former student nurse • a trained nurse • someone who “could be arrested if I said I was a nurse when I'm not” • someone who was trained in defibrillation use • someone entitled to speak as a nurse on medical matters. D) CARDIFF PRISON “BIRD CADGE” CLAIM She claims: • She spent a week in Cardiff Prison “administering medication and treatments” as part of her training. This contradicts: • Training timelines. • DBS-related clearance processes. • Prison healthcare protocols. • Her own repeated statements that she collapsed and left placements early. • Any NMC-approved prison placement availability for first-year nursing students. E) SCRUBS AND ID She displays student nurse scrubs for sale, claiming they are hers. Other statements suggest she may not have completed any clinical hours. =========================================================== 10. CLAIMS ABOUT PROFESSIONAL AUTHORITY =========================================================== She repeatedly positions herself as: • a qualified health practitioner • able to advise medically • trained in safeguarding, ASD, behaviour, midwifery and children’s nursing • competent to diagnose or triage mothers • exempt from needing health visitor referrals • a practitioner relied on by three county councils These claims conflict with: • inconsistent university timelines • variable collapse/illness narratives • missing placement evidence • statements that she never qualified. =========================================================== 11. CLAIMS ABOUT SOCIAL SERVICES, SAFEGUARDING AND HEALTH VISITING =========================================================== She claims: • To have completed mandatory health visitor training. • To have had a wise “older health visitor” mentor. • To follow health visitor safeguarding philosophy. • To have authority equivalent to health visitors. • To operate baby bank referrals as a health practitioner. But: • Health visitor placements are limited, structured, and supervised. • She simultaneously claims she collapsed during placements, making hours unlikely. • She claims both extensive and minimal clinical experience, depending on framing. =========================================================== 12. CLAIMS ABOUT DBS, CHILDCARE QUALIFICATIONS AND REGULATORY OVERSIGHT =========================================================== She claims: • Clean rolling DBS checks for family and volunteers. • Having childcare qualifications, teaching assistant experience, ASD unit work. • Being regulated by three county councils and the FCA. • Following NMC and NHS guidelines for knitted items and baby bank operations. These regulatory claims appear inconsistent with the nature of CIC operations and contradict her statements elsewhere about being “bullied by charities” and resisting scrutiny. =========================================================== 13. CLAIMS ABOUT WORK CAPACITY, SHIELDING, AND PANDEMIC HISTORY =========================================================== Her narrative shifts between: • being too ill to work (shielding) • starting the baby bank to cope with inactivity • working full-time in shops • requiring volunteers because she may be hospitalised • being palliative • being stable • working 7 days a week • being bedridden some days • planning knee replacements, tumour surgeries and transfusions • managing multiple shops • performing heavy lifting and painting • having crippling mobility issues. These claims conflict heavily with her described palliative status and severe blood conditions. =========================================================== 14. SUMMARY OF CROSS-CONTRADICTIONS =========================================================== TIMELINE CONFLICTS • Aplastic anaemia appears at least five different years with five different causes. • Tumour diagnosis alternates between 2015, 2019, and 2020 discovery. • University acceptance occurs at both age 36 and age 39. • Nursing training both began and did not begin; was completed and not completed; gave her clinical authority and yet did not result in qualification. • Collapse events occur in 2015, 2016, 2019, 2020 depending on narrative needs. • Treatments begin in 2019, 2020, 2021 depending on post. • Palliative status is claimed but inconsistent with daily high-activity lifestyle. SUBJECT-MATTER CONTRADICTIONS • Aplastic anaemia described as cancer and not cancer. • Tumour causes aplastic anaemia and does not. • Blood results found by mentor, by herself, by missing MRI, by consultant. • Nursing provided discovery of illnesses, yet illnesses pre-dated nursing. AUTHORITY CLAIM CONTRADICTIONS • Claims professional authority equivalent to health visitors, midwives, nurses. • Elsewhere states: “I could be arrested for saying I’m a nurse if I’m not.” • Claims to have extensive health qualifications but no verifiable pathway. =========================================================== 15. CONCLUSION =========================================================== Across public statements, her accounts of: – discovering blood disorders – diagnosis timelines – causes of medical conditions – nursing education – clinical placements – professional authority …are internally inconsistent and mutually incompatible. Her bio claim that she “worked with Haematology and that is how I discovered I had various blood disorders” contradicts at least four other discovery narratives she has publicly given. The broader medical and professional timelines are similarly discordant and shift dramatically depending on rhetorical purpose. This document reflects a coherent historical reconstruction of those contradictions without reference to any single transcript, but grounded in her self-published claims over time.